April 29th SDBN Biotech Journalism Panel: How Can We Improve Life Science Funding Through Better Communication? |
| Posted by Mary Canady April 1st, 2013 . |
| No Comments |
San Diego’s biotech hub is both comparable and distinguished from other regions such as Boston and San Francisco. A recent report ranked us highly compared to other life science clusters and attributed the success to our cohesiveness as a community, but also noted that our funding is far behind the Boston and San Francisco regions. In addition, sequestration threatens to impact not just our academic institutions, but the research and intellectual property that fuels our industry.
Our 400 biotech companies and 5 major research institutions are covered in only a handful …
A Basic Solution: Effective Science Communication Impacts Research Funding | |
| Posted by Jill Roughan May 3rd, 2013 . | |
| No Comments |
Obtaining funding to support basic research has always challenged scientists and entrepreneurs. However, in today’s tumultuous economic climate and looming sequester cuts, the future of life science funding is more uncertain than ever. Since San Diego has been rated among the top life science biotech regions in the US and is home to some of the world’s top research institutions, one of the things that San Diego can rely on is that we are great at innovation. So, how can we, as a community, ensure that this innovation is financially supported despite these circumstances? A panel of local science communication experts gathered to discuss these issues at SDBN’s April 29th Biotech Journalism Panel event. The panelists were Brad Fikes (San Diego Union Tribune), Heather Chambers (California Healthcare Institute), and Brian Orelli (Freelance Journalist). The panel was moderated by Carin Canale, Founder of Canale Communications and member of the Biocom board.
Let’s face it, scientists have experiments to do and grants to prepare. Most don’t want to be bothered with the particulars of how and with whom to communicate their science, outside of their sphere. But what if there was evidence that effective science communication to the public actually impacted funding? This question started the panel discussion and we quickly focused our attention on San Diego’s own success story: stem cell research. It is clear that media coverage of the stellar stem cell research community helped put our city on the map in this field. Raising public awareness of the innovative science we were doing ultimately impacted funding decisions made in Congress, the NIH, and alternative funding sources, including the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). Within the last 5 years, San Diego has become the one of the premiere regions for stem cell research and works closely with CIRM which is bringing top-rate scientists, employment opportunities and funding into the region.
However, it won’t come to anyone’s surprise that this wasn’t easy and basic research is a hard sell. So, what reagents were added to the stem cell research ‘media beaker’? Turns out, just as the science, the solution was basic as well. The main components were:
![]() |
| Photo courtesy Ramy Aziz, who Tweeted it during the event. |
A general rule of thumb and what is most important is that scientists need to know how to tell their story to different audiences. If you are able to effectively communicate your work with your peers, a layperson, various funding agencies, your institute’s Public Information Officer and a reporter, this will increase your chance for exposure because all of these individuals will share your interesting story. The panelists provided some helpful tips on things to keep in mind when trying to ‘sell your story.’
One great way to get your message out there is Twitter. Scientists tend to be risk-averse when they are experimenting with new models of scientific communication (they have enough experiments to do). However, we know that life scientists have used social media platforms such as Twitter, LinkedIn, and blogging, to obtain funding, find jobs, and build collaborations. The platform that has most recently gained a lot of momentum in the life science realm is Twitter. Twitter is an online networking tool that allows users to engage in a world-wide conversation by sharing text- based content—called tweets—of up to 140 characters. It is estimated that 3-5% of life scientists are currently using Twitter and this percentage is rapidly growing. Tweeting has evolved into a great resource where the dynamics have helped create an environment of positive scientific exchange. In fact, attendees at the SDBN event were tweeting and you can follow their virtual conversation here.
More...Biotech Journalism Panel Series Part 2: Who’s Great At Communicating San Diego Life Science? | |
| Posted by Mary Canady April 28th, 2013 . | |
| No Comments |
Part of the motivation behind organizing our upcoming biotech journalism event is that we want to encourage more communication about the terrific life science advances in the region. In putting the panel of local science communication experts together, we realized that there are many other examples we can discuss to inspire you to promote your scientific work. As part of our #SDScicomm series, here are 7 great San Diego life science communication efforts.
First, though, let’s talk about why science communication is so important. As the online media landscape is developing, the public hears from many anti-science ‘voices’ such as sources that tell them vaccinating is a bad idea and that global warming is a hoax. We crunched the numbers from a recent Pew report (the data are on p. 11 and the analysis can be found in this Google doc) and found that there has been an 11% decrease in support for life science funding over the past 26 years. Surely the reasons for this are varied, and the Pew report also points out that the public has become more austere in other areas as well (p. 6). However, if your lab/institution/company has not yet felt the effects of shrinking government and investor support, you are definitely in the minority. Science communication is now more important than ever, especially as new sources of information are taking hold.
Figure 1. US public’s support for increasing life science funding has declined 11% since 1987. Image links to supporting data.There are many resources to help you get started doing more communication and outreach such as ScienceOnline and Nature’s SpotOn science outreach initative. We will highlight the above and other local life science communication efforts at our biotech journalism event, and perhaps you know of others you’d like to share? Please leave them below, thanks!
More...Biotech Journalism Panel Series Part 1: Where Do You Get Your Local Life Science News? | |
| Posted by Mary Canady April 25th, 2013 . | |
| 3 Comments |
In anticipation of our Biotech Journalism event Monday, we’re providing resources related to San Diego life science communication tagged here with #SDScicomm (also the hashtag for the event). Over the five years since the SDBN’s creation, we’ve seen a lot of changes such as the SDUT’s acquisition of the North County Times, the rising popularity of news organizations such as Xconomy, and more local companies starting blogs. Keeping in touch with the local life science news is important for many reasons: to learn about advances, funding, jobs, and events. We cover many sources in our news feeds, which you can subscribe to, and we’ve also created a Facebook interest group you can follow. If you have another news source, contact us and we’ll add it. Also, encourage your organization to provide more news and information online, preferably with an RSS feed, as this is how we combine them into a single source. Share news and events with your colleagues and friends too, this helps science in the region gain more visibility.
So, tell us, which of news sources do you use? Comment below!
| Institution | Resource | Links |
|---|---|---|
| Accelrys | Blog | URL |
| Allele Biotech | Blog | URL,RSS |
| Assay Depot | Blog | URL, RSS |
| Biocom | Event Calendar | URL |
| BioSpace* | News | URL |
| Genomeweb* | News | URL, RSS |
| Illumina | Blog | URL,RSS |
| Life Technologies | Blog | URL, RSS |
| MO BIO | Blog | URL,RSS |
| Salk Institute | Event Calendar | URL (mailing list) |
| Salk Institute | News | RSS |
| San Diego Business Journal | News | URL |
| San Diego Biotechnology Connection | News | URL,RSS |
| San Diego Union Tribune | News | URL,RSS |
| Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute | Blog | URL,RSS |
| SDBN | News, Event Calendar | URL,RSS (feeds) |
| The Scripps Research Institute | News | RSS |
| Trilink Biotechnologies | Blog | URL,RSS |
| UCSD | News | RSS |
| Xconomy | News | URL,RSS |
*Requires filtering for San Diego news.
More...SDBN 2013 Poll Results: Drug Development, Translational Research, Green Tech Top Interests | |
| Posted by Mary Canady February 7th, 2013 . | |
| No Comments |
We have the results of our 2013 poll. You can see the questions we asked here, we kept it short this year. See the results below and we will try to cover the interests and companies you are interested in!
| Company of Interest | # Votes |
|---|---|
| Illumina | 5 |
| Novartis | 3 |
| Genomatica | 2 |
| GNF | 2 |
| Intrexon | 2 |
| Life Technologies | 2 |
| Pfizer | 2 |
| Sapphire Energy | 2 |
| Sequenom | 2 |
| Synthetic Genomics | 2 |
| Verenium | 2 |
| Amgen | 1 |
| BP Biofuels | 1 |
| Cardinal Health | 1 |
| Ceres | 1 |
| Dart Neurosciences | 1 |
| Ferring | 1 |
| Halozyme | 1 |
| Johnson and Johnson | 1 |
| Roche | 1 |
| SG Biofuels | 1 |
| Takeda | 1 |
| Trius Therapeutics | 1 |
| Verdezyne | 1 |
| Vertex | 1 |
SDBN 2013 Poll | |
| Posted by Mary Canady January 17th, 2013 . | |
| No Comments |